Serra Verde 400 kV Interconnector

Assessment by Altus Ecologia · eu_eia · version: A tidy version with nothing wrong planted. A trustworthy checker should stay quiet here — this is the smoke test. Always look at it first.

Clean Hard mode With known problems

Synthetic test data — fictional geography. Never merge into a real assessment.

How did the review perform?

Passed the smoke test On the clean version our checks stayed quiet, as they should.

One honest caveat. We also flag a structural condition present in every version of these documents, so it isn't part of the planted set:

Commitments T-02 are named but carry no budget, indicator or responsible party in the register.

We show it rather than hide it.

What the review found

major present in all versions

Bird flight diverters specified without monitoring or owner

Commitments T-02 are named but carry no budget, indicator or responsible party in the register.

Rule: A promise with no funding or owner · Where: commitments.csv

Coverage — every obligation, and where the gaps are

4 of 7 obligations have no evidence at all yet — a lender's reviewer asks about these first.

Status	Who owns it	What's required
no evidence yet	route and land	Provide a description of the project, the likely significant effects, the features to avoid, prevent or reduce them, and a description of reasonable a… Article 5(1) and Annex IV
no evidence yet	legal and regulatory	Ensure the report is prepared by competent experts and is subject to a completeness and quality check by the competent authority. Article 5(3)
no evidence yet	stakeholder engagement	Inform and consult the public early and effectively, with a reasonable timeframe, and take the outcome into account in the decision. Article 6(2)-(4)
no evidence yet	avifauna and biodiversity	Assess avian collision and electrocution risk along the full route with species-specific flight height and sensitivity data, and specify marking. Good practice, overhead line design
problem found	legal and regulatory	Attach monitoring measures to the development consent, proportionate to the nature and significance of the effects. Article 8a(1)(b) and (4)
checked, OK	avifauna and biodiversity	Identify and assess direct and indirect significant effects on population and human health, biodiversity, land, soil, water, air, climate, material as… Article 3(1)
checked, OK	legal and regulatory	Where a project is likely to have significant effects on the environment of another Member State, undertake transboundary consultation. Article 7

⬇ Download the governance report (PDF)