SLRCONSULTING
Independent Impact Assessment Governance

Kanjeza Gorge Hydropower Project

Assessment by Meridian Environmental Partners · ifc_ps_ep4 · version: A tidy version with nothing wrong planted. A trustworthy checker should stay quiet here — this is the smoke test. Always look at it first.
CleanHard modeWith known problems
Synthetic test data — fictional geography. Never merge into a real assessment.

How did the review perform?

Passed the smoke test On the clean version our checks stayed quiet, as they should.

What the review found

No problems raised.

Coverage — every obligation, and where the gaps are

5 of 15 obligations have no evidence at all yet — a lender's reviewer asks about these first.

StatusWho owns itWhat's required
no evidence yethydrology and sedimentAssess sediment trapping and downstream geomorphic response over the operating life, including delta and floodplain consequences.
WBG EHS Guidelines, hydropower
no evidence yetstakeholder engagementConduct Informed Consultation and Participation for Category A projects, documented and proportionate to risk.
EP4 Principle 5
no evidence yetterrestrial biodiversityApply the mitigation hierarchy: anticipate and avoid, then minimise, then compensate or offset residual impacts.
PS1 para 14
no evidence yetresettlement and livelihoodsWhere Indigenous Peoples are affected, obtain Free, Prior and Informed Consent for relocation, critical cultural heritage or land use impacts.
PS7 paras 12-17
no evidence yetcultural heritageIdentify cultural heritage including graves and sacred sites, and apply chance-find procedures and consultation on removal or relocation.
PS8 paras 16-17
checked, OKlegal and regulatoryPublicly disclose the assessment documentation for a minimum of 30 days before financial close, accurately reflecting the underlying findings.
EP4 Principle 10
checked, OKclimate and ghgFor Category A projects, assess climate change risk including a TCFD-aligned physical and transition risk assessment, an alternatives analysis for les…
EP4 Principle 2 and Annex A
checked, OKaquatic ecology and fisheriesEstablish a current environmental and social baseline of sufficient detail to characterise risks and impacts, informed by recent conditions.
PS1 para 7
checked, OKhydrology and sedimentAssess cumulative impacts of the project together with other existing, planned or reasonably defined developments on the same receptors.
PS1 para 8
checked, OKlegal and regulatoryEstablish an ESMP in which every mitigation measure has an action, a responsible party, a budget, a timeframe and a monitoring indicator.
PS1 paras 24-27
checked, OKstakeholder engagementOperate a grievance mechanism and demonstrate that concerns raised are assessed and responded to.
PS1 paras 35-36
checked, OKdam safety and geotechAddress community health, safety and security risks, including structural safety of dams and reservoir-associated disease.
PS4 paras 5, 9
checked, OKresettlement and livelihoodsIdentify and compensate economic displacement, including loss of livelihood or access to resources where no physical relocation occurs, and restore li…
PS5 paras 5, 25-29
checked, OKterrestrial biodiversityDetermine whether critical habitat is present and, where it is, meet the no-net-loss and net-gain requirements with documented justification.
PS6 paras 16-19
checked, OKhydrology and sedimentWhere the project affects a river system, sustain environmental flows adequate to maintain downstream ecosystem function and dependent uses.
PS6 para 24

⬇ Download the governance report (PDF)